Large language models (LLMs) power ChatGPT, Cursor, support bots—almost every AI app. This article maps the text model ecosystem in 2026.
What Text Models Do
text in → model → text out
Capabilities:
generate articles, code, email
understand summarize, classify, sentiment, translate
reason math, logic, multi-step analysis
tools function calling → APIs, commands
persona follow system prompts
Core mechanism: next-token prediction (see fundamentals #02). Everything else follows.
Mainstream Models (2026 Reference)
| Model | Vendor | Context | Strengths | Price (input/1M tokens) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | OpenAI | 128K | general + tools | ~$2.5 |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Anthropic | 200K | code, long text, safety | ~$3 |
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | 1M | huge context, multimodal | ~$0.1 | |
| DeepSeek V3 | DeepSeek | 128K | cost, Chinese, code | ~$0.27 |
| Llama 3.3 70B | Meta | 128K | top open weights, self-host | free (self-host) |
| Qwen 2.5 72B | Alibaba | 128K | Chinese, open, many sizes | free (self-host) |
Pricing shifts fast—verify vendor pages when choosing.
Closed vs Open
Closed (API)
Pros: strongest models, zero ops, continuous updates
Cons: data residency, vendor lock-in, linear cost at scale
Examples: GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini
Best for: fast MVP, strongest capability, moderate privacy needs
Open (Self-Host)
Pros: data stays local, predictable cost at volume, fine-tunable
Cons: GPU ops, slightly behind frontier closed models
Examples: Llama 3, Qwen, DeepSeek weights, Mistral
Best for: regulated industries, high volume, customization
Real Choices
- Cursor: multi-model (GPT-4o, Claude, custom)
- Notion AI: OpenAI early, added cheaper/open models later
- Bank support (CN): Qwen on-prem, data never leaves network
Real Capability Boundaries
| Genuinely strong | Looks strong but isn’t |
|---|---|
| Code generation/explanation | Exact arithmetic (use calculator tool) |
| Summarization, translation | Live facts (training cutoff) |
| Structured JSON output | 100% factual accuracy |
| Major languages | low-resource languages/dialects |
| Complex instructions | very long chains without error |
Model Selection Tree
Need top general capability?
yes → GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet
no ↓
Need context > 200K?
yes → Gemini 2.0 Flash
no ↓
Must keep data on-prem?
yes → Qwen 2.5 / DeepSeek V3 self-host
no ↓
Cost-sensitive, high volume?
yes → DeepSeek V3 API
no ↓
Chinese-optimized?
yes → DeepSeek V3 or Qwen
no → Llama 3.3 or GPT-4o-mini
What’s Next
- Reasoning models (o1, R1): more compute at inference → better math/logic
- Agent-native models: built-in planning and tool use
- On-device small models: 3B–8B on phone/PC
- MoE (DeepSeek V3, Mixtral): scale capacity, control inference cost
References
Summary
Text models are the brain of AI apps. 2026 = closed frontier + open catch-up + reasoning models rising. No universal winner—match scenario, budget, and data constraints.